Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "comment reply":
When 1+1 does not = 2 you form a group of people who are concerned. If there is nothing out there to hide why would anyone or any group be subject to such a group? Believe none of what you hear and half of what you see. Each individual who takes part in any transaction/action should be held accountable for their actions weather it is in a form of a lie or an unethical action. What needs to get done is to stop this 5th grade behavior and address the issues. I can say an owner at LA i want answers and have every right to them. If you can't give a valid answer then just like when you get the overdue notice and claim you paid cash we all know you didn't pay. Enough is enough and lets move forward and get the answers so the problems can get fixed and bring justice to any wrongful actions that have been committed
anon - you have a right to get a straightforward answer to whatever questions you may have-- this needs to be the number 1 issue for the new manager-- he must be available to meet with community members and be prepared to give them honest answers to their questions -- a new manager can't do anything about what happened before he came to la but he can set the course for the future by being open and honest-- of course members must realize that a new manager may not have all the answers and need to give him time to review the operations at la and see what is happening within the organization-- then steps can be formulated to try to allieviate the concerns of members-- the bod will have to support the new manager and allow him to proceed to manage la -- if they don't support his efforts then it won't work and la will be no better off then when they had the previous management --that manager seemed to get itself into a situation that went from bad to worst-- we'll see what happens!
#148
Sunday, August 24, 2008
comment reply
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
There seems to be a misconception of what CCLA is. The truth of the matter is, the last very large increase in our dues was against our covenants. many people gave their own money to hire a lawyer requesting the PM to show cause, where the money is going. As stated at the July meeting Gary along with some board memebers opted to pay LA lawyer $2000 rather than make the records public. If there is nothing to hide, why not? We are property owners and have a right to know. We can't have the powers that be taking more and more from us with no accountability. The purpose of CCLA is to lower the dues to a fairer more manageable amount to benefit all of Lake Adventure, not just a chosen few.Why then the hate campaign against CCLA, i can only believe those who shout the loudest and become the most beligerant have the most to hide. the amount of 91,000 is a rumor put out there to discredit CCLA and inflame property owners. The CCla is not suing LA and this amount is ludicrous. Why would CCLA use there own personal funds to sue themselves? People need to really start thinking for themselves. CCLA is not funded by any LA monies. It is totally privately funded, which has become an oodity in LA considering not too many people will offer any kind of service without remuneration. It's been said at meetings, Gary is gone, that's past, lets move on, Consider this,whatever incidents led to Gary's dismissal could not have been carried out without the approval of some board members, past and present, for this has been going on a long time. Some of these past members are already jockeying for a seat on the board again. Why? to serve property owners and to look out for our best interests. Looking at their past records, i don't see anything outstanding done for us as a whole. These are also the people who want to keep everything status quo, not wanting records to become public.So yes Gary is gone, the catastrohe he left behind is still in place, and until that is cleaned up LA cannot truly move on. It's the same problem, just moving the players around, so we are in fact still trapped in the past. I had to ask myself why anyone would cry when they lost their seat on the board and why the spouse would verbally attack someone right after the loss, I can't believe its the loss of prestige and must be more than the occasional free meal
ReplyDeleteSo yes CCLA members must be silent about their identity. They are using their own money to help everyone. the thank you they have received for fighting these outrageous dues at their own expense is threats of stoning.To those who are circulating rumors and want to pretend all is well not making things public, and inciting neighbor against neighbor, what are you fighting for?