a few observations and wondering what's going on with the following:
MANAGER SELECTION PROCESS AND THE WINNER IS?
THE 12' WIDE ISSUE WITH THE NEW LAWYER?
THE 12' WIDE ISSUE STILL A VIABLE ISSUE OR DEAD ISSUE?
THE CLOSING OF THE LAUNDRY -- TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT?
THE REMODELING OF THE LAUNDRY -- ON HOLD OR DEAD ISSUE?
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES HOLDING UP OR ARE DEFAULTS INCREASING WITH THE TOUGH ECONOMIC TIMES?
ANY CONTINGENCY PLANS TO SAVE MONEY IF DEFAULTS CLIMB?
any one got any answers it would be good to know since many members are interested in these matters -- maybe some one from the bod will respond (don't hold your breath)
#87
WE'RE MOVING TO A NEW ADDRESS !!!!!!
STOP OVER A TAKE A PEEK AT THE NEW LOOK!
Friday, October 24, 2008
unanswered questions
Posted by
chipper
at
10:30 PM
0
comments
Labels: 12' wide, bod, CONTINGENCY PLANS, finances, laundry, manager
Saturday, October 4, 2008
comment reply
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "LAUDRY RENOVATIONS":
Maybe if the machines did an adequate job more members would use the LA laundromat. I was up at LA most of July and August this year, and each week I took all my laundry to an outside facility so I wouldn't have to waste my time and money at LA. Believe me, it would be a lot more convenient and easier to do it at LA!
anon -- i agree -- i used it through the summer also and yes it took plenty of tokens to get anything dry -- but i still say that if too much is spent here on this laundry then that is questionable use of la assets -- dollars!!!!
Posted by
chipper
at
9:25 PM
2
comments
LAUDRY RENOVATIONS

i see by the notice on the la web site that the laundry is being closed for renovations -- god only knows it needs it but at what cost to the community -- this is a service that is utilized by very few community members and surely doesn't pay for itself -- if it does it would amaze me -- --
has anyone ever done a financial analysis on this service to determine how it is operating, how many members use this facility, how much money it grosses, does it produce a profit or a loss-- or then finally is it cost effective for the entire membership to have to pay for this renovation and maybe upgrade-- my guess is that it is used by very few people-- i base this on a polls i took
DO YOU USE THE LAUNDRY FACILITY?
--------- YES --- 145
---------- NO--- 34
HOW OFTEN DO YOU USE THE LAUNDRY FACILITY?
--------- EVERY TRIP ------------- 3
-------------OFTEN -------------- 4
--------OCCASIONALLY ----------- 138
-------------- NEVER ------------ 32
this indicates that few if anyone uses this facility on a regular basis -- most people coming to la don't come to do their laundry -- they take it home --also the most members visiting la are weekenders and there is no need to have to do the dirty cloths here at la--- the usage is the 20 or so nesters and they also generate the most consistent complaints -- to satisfy them the bod is spending money to quiet them down -- all members pay for this type of waste and it shouldn't happen -- money should not be spent unless there is a real need-- this laundry is not a real need or priority!!!!
you have got to question how much is being spent on a service that few if any members use or want -- i'm sure it is not cost effective to be spending this money --
this is an another example of mismanagement of the la assets by this board--there are plenty more and we'll get to them in due time -- this bod is the gift that keeps giving--so more to follow
#107
Posted by
chipper
at
9:11 PM
1 comments
Labels: bod, laundry, mismangement